57A126
Sea-ice thickness distribution derived from surface elevation
and compared with measured thickness values obtained during Antarctic
cruises
Burcu Ozsoy-Cicek, Stephen F. Ackley, Hongjie Xie
Corresponding author: Burcu Ozsoy-Cicek –
burcu@drcicek.com
For Antarctic sea ice, computing ice thicknesses from
known parameters such as snow depth and ice freeboard is still in a
developmental state. In this study, data from 16 Antarctic cruises – five
cruises for the Weddell Sea sector, four cruises for the Bellingshausen and
Amundsen Seas sector, one cruise for the Ross Sea sector, and six cruises for
the Indian Ocean and Western Pacific Ocean sectors – which had
measurements of surface elevation (or snow depth), ice freeboard (height above
or below sea level of the ice surface) and ice thickness were compiled and
standardized. Typically these data were measured by using ice augers to measure
ice thickness, usually at 1 m intervals for distances nominally from 50 m to 100
m profiles. The snow depth and the ice freeboard were also measured at the same
1 m spacing. The relations between snow depth, ice/snow freeboard and ice
thickness for each cruise were derived and analyzed. Those relations were
separated in each sea sectors and seasons for the entire Antarctic. For this
study, single mean values for each of the profiles (tens to hundred of meters)
of ice thickness, elevation and ice freeboard were computed. The mean ice
thickness was first estimated using an isostatic relationship with prescribed
values for the snow, ice, water densities and the measured values of mean snow
depth and mean ice freeboard. The second estimate of ice thickness computation
took into account the increased density of flooded snow, if the ice freeboard
was negative (below sea level). We found that errors in thickness prediction
compared with measured values were excessive if the flooded condition of the
surface was not taken into account. However, we also found, unlike for Arctic
sea ice, that snow elevation and snow depth are well correlated for Antarctic
sea ice. This correlation implies that snow elevation from satellite laser
altimetry may alone suffice for the crucial estimate of snow depth, necessary
for estimating ice thickness from space, over Antarctic sea ice. New algorithms
for estimating Antarctic sea-ice thickness from snow elevation, derivable from
satellite laser altimetry, will be presented.
Go Back