57A153
Survey of air–sea-ice
CO2 fluxes in Barrow, Alaska
Bernard Heinesch, Marc Aubinet, Gauthier Carnat, Hajo Eincken,
Nicolas-Xavier Geilfus, Tim Papakyriakou, Michel Yernaux, Jean-Louis Tison,
Bruno Delille
Corresponding author: Bernard Heinesch –
bernard.heinesch@ulg.ac.be
We carried out a 6 month study that aimed to robustly
track CO2 exchange between landfast
sea ice and the atmosphere during the winter and spring season. A meteorological
mast equipped for eddy-covariance measurements was installed on landfast sea ice
near Barrow (Alaska), 1 km off the coast, from the end of January 2009 to the
beginning of June 2009, before ice break-up. These data were supported by
continuous measurements of solar radiation, snow depth, ice thickness and
temperature profile in the ice. Biogeochemical data necessary for the
understanding of the CO2 dynamics in
sea ice were obtained through discrete ice coring. Two regimes were detected for
the CO2 exchanges linked with the
status of the sea ice: a winter regime and a spring summer regime. From 27 March
onwards brine volume at the sea-ice–snow interface was above the threshold
of permeability for liquid according to Golden and others (1998). During this
period, we observed some conspicuous
CO2 fluxes events tightly linked to
wind speed. The flux was directed from the sea ice to the atmosphere and reached
up to 0.6 µmol m–2
s–1 (51.8 mmol
m–2
d–1). This flux to the
atmosphere is expected as sea ice at the air interface is permeable during a
large part of the period and brines are oversaturated compared with the
atmosphere. CO2 may accumulate in the
snow layer which thus acts as a buffer that is flushed under occurrence of high
wind speeds and associated pressure pumping. During the spring/summer period,
i.e. from 27 April onwards, we observed a marked increase in sea-ice
temperature. Temperature profiles suggest that convective events occurred within
the ice cover between 27 April and 5 May. Within these convective events, two
regimes were observed. First, for a period of 5 days,
pCO2 was still above the threshold of
saturation and CO2 fluxes were still
mainly positive but lower than in the winter period, ranging from 0.1 to 0.2
µmol m–2
s–1. This flux was only
moderately controlled by wind speed perhaps due to the reduced snow cover.
Further temperature increase led to a second flux regime where
pCO2 of the brines were undersatured
and sea ice shifted from a source to a sink of
CO2 for the atmosphere, ranging from
0.0 to 0.1 µmol m–2
s–1. These latter fluxes
showed a diurnal pattern with no exchange during the night and downward fluxes
during the day.
Go Back